It's telling of our delusions that we pick (often loner) apex predators for our iconography, when we really are a mid-food chain social animal.
Conversation
If we were honest about our natural pre-cultural inclinations, we'd wear banners of cattle, horses and pheasanidae, not lions, wolves and eagles.
1
1
Temperamentally, I am much closer to a rooster or a stallion than a lion or a tiger.
And the stallion is already pushing it a bit.
1
That we've fashioned guns to kill apex predators from a distance doesn't change the pants-shitting experience of facing one of these things unarmed.
1
This may sound all sound trivial - totally get it if you feel that way - but I think a lot of our worst behaviour grows out of this self-delusion.
1
The Romans carried eagles on their standards. The Soviets had their bear. The Third Reich and the Americans both adopted the eagle. Etc. etc.
1
When you envision yourself as a predator, killing prey becomes a natural extension of your very existence.
1
Replying to
The eagle was used as a symbol to claim the legacy of the roman empire and civilization. In short The west. Its more of a cultural claim than territorial.
2
1
Replying to
Good point, but doesn't alter the issue much when you look at the symbolic usage - Third Reich imperial ambitions, US "America, FUCK YEAH!" sentiment etc.
Replying to
The Empire as an idea propably came from the East, Persian, Alexander, Rome but it took hold as originally the west was City States/Feuds. But ever since the son of Zeus built the first western empire,The eagle became the symbol of *by divine right* western emperors.
2
On second thought the eagle symbolizes the Divine Right by which the ermperors rule.The Eagle of Zeus delivers the divine grace to the emperor