Conversation

Funnily enough, this is close to one of the main insights of meditation.

@RT_com's account has been withheld in Portugal, Finland, Sweden, Ireland, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Italy, Malta, Germany, Greece, Romania, Netherlands, Bulgaria, Austria, Luxembourg, Latvia, United Kingdom, Denmark, Lithuania, Croatia, Estonia, Cyprus, France, Spain, Belgium in response to a legal demand. Learn more.

1

1

3

Replying to

Certainly our subjective experience can be deconstructed that way. The ontological status of the realization itself is debatable, though...

1

1

Replying to

So far the physics is lining up with the core realizations remarkably well. Doesn't mean they're all right, but... the record is good.

1

Replying to

The record has the exact same fundamental problem as our 3D rendition of our reality, though: there's no reason to believe it's complete.

12:53 PM · Dec 30, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

I do wonder if our concept of "true" and "false" aren't pathetically childish, though. I suspect logic is a false model at a metaphysical level.

1

Replying to

and

@OortCloudAtlas

episode with Almaas has a great take on this: why believe that Nothingness, Oneness or Nonduality is fundamentally more real?

1

1

Show replies

Replying to

nothing is complete. That isn't a reason to reject.

1

Replying to

It's not a rejection. I just question its primacy over e.g. a 3D view.

1

Show replies