I am getting very tired of blanket moral rules which ignore consent, as well as swift rushes to condemn. Much of it smells like moral performing, more than conviction and is "performative". Told what is right/wrong, paroting it.
Conversation
I vaguely remember seeing some TV recordings of condescending 50-60 somethings calling ~30 year olds youths in the 70s, but damn.
1
1
Replying to
Eh, in the 70s that actually wasn't the attitude. You were an adult when you moved out, and that could be 16.
Old enough to remember.
1
1
Replying to
Might have been the 60s. Equally probable since the guys were hippies. But I guess what being an adult means has also changed.
1
1
That e.g. someone my age can tell someone your age to fuck off without risking censure seems a recent invention in most parts of the world.
1
1
Replying to
oh sure, but that's not about being an adult, that's about respect for age. Different things.
1
1
Replying to
Mmh, but there's an implied hierarchy of less-more adult there.
Weird to me anyway; Norway has been moving away from that for many generations.
Replying to
Adult when I was growing up mean "takes on adult responsibilities". That's all.
1
1
2
people who are old, are assumed worthy of respect because they have seen/done more than you have. It's about respect due experience.
1
1
2
Show replies

