... even then, the whole thing becomes rather contrived, turns into more of an exercise in imagination than processing emotion as such.
Conversation
Sounds a bit like several practices in the Tibetan models - which can easily be very contrived and mental masturbation, they can also be very powerful and/or liberating, when the conditions are right.
1
I have had massive payoff from meditating on difficult emotions -as they arise-, but I seldom manage to invoce them mid-sitting.
3
Replying to
Just making the space every damn day matters. I'm starting to think I need to fine tune the description of that practice though.
2
2
Replying to
You mean in the sense of: opening up to negative emotions, but passing over it in silence if nothing comes up?
2
1
Replying to
But people seem to often have nothing going on. How did they get so happy? Maybe they had nice lives!
2
2
Replying to
It's not happiness; it's not-unhappiness. Low neuroticism.
Personality + relative lack of childhood trauma and parental stress.
2
2
Plenty of very happy people who are yet also basket cases. Different modalities.
1
Basket case in which sense of the phrase? I’m sure you’re probably right on this - just in terms I haven’t considered before.
I think often that happiness isn’t the right goal for meditators, one can be happy and sad at the same time and still feel very well & wholehearted.
1
I think that lines up quite well with your use of ‘low neuroticism’ - but I’m not so sure. Need to consider this more I guess.
1
It's not mine. It's one of the few stable findings of psychology. Big five.
Happiness relates to extraversion, mostly.
Low neuroticism is low reactivity to and propensity for experiencing negative emotions. Lingering less on them, too.
2
Show replies


