Conversation

Replying to

and

A more interesting possibility is that IQ measures a cluster of traits up to a threshold, past which more factors are involved.

Replying to

and

I know the approximate IQs of several friends of mine. Some proximates I can easily relate to, intellectually. Others feel entirely alien.

Replying to

and

Feels like whatever is driving the performance of their intelligence is not, broadly speaking, the same as for me.

Replying to

It seems the further out to the edges you go, the higher the variation.

Replying to

My hypothesis is it's not just normal trait variation, but the influx of additional factors - sort of disinhibitors for cognitive power.

Replying to

Do you mean in relation to high IQ or meditation?

Replying to

IQ in particular. E.g.

@iwelsh

mentioned my empathy as being a peculiar multiplier for certain kinds of abilities. Tempted to agree.

Replying to

and

The disinhibition only increases with meditation, especially certain kinds of practice. Hence the origin of siddhis, I'm guessing.

Replying to

and

I suppose that's a rather different form of disinhibition, but yes, I'd guess so too. Might also explain why scientific types seem to gain-

Replying to

and

-quite a lot from meditation. They tend to be high in intellect but low in openness to experience. More openness; intelligence unshackles.

Replying to

and

There is a strong tendency for paradigm shifts to be attributed to people who, in scientific circles, are seen as quite eccentric.

6:48 PM · Oct 28, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

Those people would fit in as artist. By contrast, most artists seem to be insufficiently interested in abstract ideas to become scientists.