We know we're causing harm now, though… how long should we wait to try to do better?
Conversation
Replying to
but we can't say with such certainty that we are choosing between extinction and food for everyone. In fact we already have that food.
1
Replying to
We do at the moment, but GM tech may be necessary to cope with a growing population in a changing climate.
3
Replying to
What makes you think population will keep growing if Asia is hit by drought? Death toll would likely exceed 2 billion.
1
Replying to
But it's a very high-risk line of thinking, resting once again on the assumption that we know exactly where we're headed.
1
It's great to talk about the potential problems of GM tech, but let's not demonise the concept.
1
"Green" groups already did this with nuclear power and I think the best evidence is that had a huge cost.
1
Sure, we should be wary, this is big stuff. But we need to inform not mislead and view the various issues independently.
3
Replying to
If we had all embraced this tech, the ramifications might scale faster than the number of disasters. Who knows the systemic effects?
Replying to
Nuclear development more or less ground to a halt and is only recently picking up because we have no choice.
1
Replying to
We don't? Other forms of power are facing regulatory shutdown despite lower/virtually no risk by comparison.
1
Show replies