Conversation

Replying to

and

supports and underpins this view with his own experience & example. I think I agree with both of those things, as stated.

Replying to

and

What I'm struggling with here, is that it seems especially hard not just to get people to abandon stories (bad, for reasons I'll touch on),-

Replying to

and

- but that getting any traction at all in changing the thrust of those stories is nigh-impossible, even with empathy & opportunity.

Replying to

and

Storytelling is inextricably linked with survival. Without a story to tell, people die. No meaning -> no reason to live. No conflict there.

Replying to

and

So we need stories and I'm not saying we should get rid of those, just so we're clear. I don't think that's desirable.

Replying to

and

there's a point at which it may desirable to ditch all. But 99.99% aren't there. Heck, I doubt I am.

Replying to

and

Even if we ditched conscious stories about ourselves and others, I suspect stories/models are the underpinning of our thinking capabilities.

Replying to

and

It may be a baseline unit of sensory processing, but one, much like fear, that you don't need to be attached to per se.

Replying to

and

I feel like my own attachment to the stories (yet I'm still telling them) seems to be approaching 0, which makes them oddly hydralike.

Replying to

and

My stories are constantly dying and forming new branches. They seem to do that without issue, keeping internal consistency remarkably well.

Replying to

and

Sometimes they retcon things, sometimes they rewrite them entirely, mostly they leave them the same and append some commentary to them.

7:37 AM · Aug 29, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

I think it worked a lot less well before I stopped caring so much about whether the stories were true or not. Maybe that's what I mean.