@ParadoxNow_ talks about how storytelling can be a means for transformative growth, and how stories usually have some hidden truth.
Conversation
supports and underpins this view with his own experience & example.
I think I agree with both of those things, as stated.
1
What I'm struggling with here, is that it seems especially hard not just to get people to abandon stories (bad, for reasons I'll touch on),-
1
1
- but that getting any traction at all in changing the thrust of those stories is nigh-impossible, even with empathy & opportunity.
1
Storytelling is inextricably linked with survival. Without a story to tell, people die. No meaning -> no reason to live.
No conflict there.
1
So we need stories and I'm not saying we should get rid of those, just so we're clear. I don't think that's desirable.
2
1
We use stories to get around the world, define ourselves against others, try to understand ourselves and countless more things, obviously.
1
1
The problem is some of these stories are poisonous, to ourselves, others or both.
E.g. "I'm all that matters," the story of a sociopath.
2
1
Let's return to heuristics. Stories are heuristical. They teach general truths at the cost of precision when applied to individual cases.
1
1
Heuristics are fucking awesome. Without them we wouldn't be much good at making decisions.
But they work over an array of situations.
1
1
When we try to use a heuristic to explain discrete situations instead of to steer habits & responses, they break down.
It's not their job.
Having a story about yourself, there's nothing more tempting than to explain -everything- with recourse to the story you're telling.
1
1
So that's fine, you can have your story about yourself.
You'll get a lot of stuff wrong, but you can at least make effective decisions.
1
Show replies
