This entire category of behaviours is extremely rational in situations it evolved from. That said, many situations in which it doesn't fit.
Conversation
My Sami ancestors dreaded the Chuds, because they showed up to raid, rape and murder. Saxons feared my Norse ancestors, Romans the Saxons...
1
I blame nobody in Syria right now if they have a fear/hatred of bearded Arabs, or Afghan minorities of Pashtos, etc. etc.
1
However, what often seems to happen is that hatreds and fears transfer mostly by hearsay and cultural bigotry, rather than lived experience.
1
I have an "irrational" loathing of Romani people after I was attacked by a bunch of youths and pickpocketed separately in 1 year in Prague-
1
1
- plus several other beliggerent or malevolent encounters in the same city. I know the problems these communities suffer, and yet...
1
I would never justify applying these aversions on an individual basis, or to repress or otherwise attack communities, but it's not idiotic.
2
applying these aversions on individual basis is exactly what i'm calling idiotic tho. i got mugged by group of black dudes in amsterdam but
1
if i then hated every black person i encountered in life knowing nothing about them except their skin color, i think that would be idiotic
2
It's important to recognize that this heuristic, correctly us, is based on culture. Black guy or the ever popular "muslim" - not a culture.
1
1
Wahabbism, Nazism, Romani (culture not ethnicity) and Afghan mountain tribes imply certain cultural properties. Skin color does not; cannot.
right! this is why my tweet was about the stupidity of hating individuals bc of unchangeable surface characteristics, which many ppl do
1
let us be honest, it goes a bit further than that. If you belong to a certain group it is rational, to, say, hate Israelis (not jews)
1
Well, uh, exactly. Point was about rationality of expecting similar behaviors. Blacks are a phenotype, not a social group. Israelis, OTOH...
2
Show replies


