Conversation

Replying to

hating someone purely because they belong to a certain group you do not belong to is almost always idiotic and reprehensible

Replying to

Ah? Well, I suppose I agree, so long as you remember almost. At various times & places it's perfectly rational.

Replying to

right, yeah, had to include the "almost" to encompass KKK members, nazis, etc

Replying to

and

This entire category of behaviours is extremely rational in situations it evolved from. That said, many situations in which it doesn't fit.

Replying to

and

My Sami ancestors dreaded the Chuds, because they showed up to raid, rape and murder. Saxons feared my Norse ancestors, Romans the Saxons...

Replying to

and

I blame nobody in Syria right now if they have a fear/hatred of bearded Arabs, or Afghan minorities of Pashtos, etc. etc.

Replying to

and

However, what often seems to happen is that hatreds and fears transfer mostly by hearsay and cultural bigotry, rather than lived experience.

Replying to

and

I have an "irrational" loathing of Romani people after I was attacked by a bunch of youths and pickpocketed separately in 1 year in Prague-

Replying to

and

- plus several other beliggerent or malevolent encounters in the same city. I know the problems these communities suffer, and yet...

Replying to

and

I would never justify applying these aversions on an individual basis, or to repress or otherwise attack communities, but it's not idiotic.

Replying to

and

Especially, as is often the case with reprehensible groups like Jihadis and Nazis, if the ethics of their cultural group are evil.

5:36 PM · Aug 5, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

yeah "almost" was meant to exclude cases like hatred for groups w evil goals, tho important to be very cautious about applying "evil" label

Replying to

and

The difference is you don't have to label people explicitly. Heuristically avoiding skinheads, Romani thugs etc. will mostly serve you well.

Show replies