hating someone purely because they possess certain unchangeable physical characteristics is always idiotic and reprehensible
Conversation
Replying to
hating someone purely because they belong to a certain group you do not belong to is almost always idiotic and reprehensible
1
2
Replying to
Ah? Well, I suppose I agree, so long as you remember almost. At various times & places it's perfectly rational.
1
2
This entire category of behaviours is extremely rational in situations it evolved from. That said, many situations in which it doesn't fit.
1
My Sami ancestors dreaded the Chuds, because they showed up to raid, rape and murder. Saxons feared my Norse ancestors, Romans the Saxons...
1
I blame nobody in Syria right now if they have a fear/hatred of bearded Arabs, or Afghan minorities of Pashtos, etc. etc.
1
However, what often seems to happen is that hatreds and fears transfer mostly by hearsay and cultural bigotry, rather than lived experience.
1
I have an "irrational" loathing of Romani people after I was attacked by a bunch of youths and pickpocketed separately in 1 year in Prague-
1
1
- plus several other beliggerent or malevolent encounters in the same city. I know the problems these communities suffer, and yet...
1
I would never justify applying these aversions on an individual basis, or to repress or otherwise attack communities, but it's not idiotic.
Especially, as is often the case with reprehensible groups like Jihadis and Nazis, if the ethics of their cultural group are evil.
1
yeah "almost" was meant to exclude cases like hatred for groups w evil goals, tho important to be very cautious about applying "evil" label
1
Show replies
applying these aversions on individual basis is exactly what i'm calling idiotic tho. i got mugged by group of black dudes in amsterdam but
1
if i then hated every black person i encountered in life knowing nothing about them except their skin color, i think that would be idiotic
2
Show replies


