A characteristic of all the so-called New Atheists is that they appear to be very convinced they, themselves, lack petty motivations.
Conversation
Replying to
That's a take which is laughable to anyone who understands half as much about human motivation as they profess to do. It shows, here.
1
Replying to
"I, Sam Harris, am here to engage you in fruitful conversation. What constitutes fruitful conversation is equal to my definition of such."
1
Replying to
The attempt to find common ground is visibly disingenuous, inasmuch as the easiest way to find common ground is to respond directly.
1
Replying to
... not to entangle the person *you approached for debate* in some morass of verbal cliches and thought experiments.
1
Replying to
In that sense, Chomsky's anger and vitriol is both entirely justified and entirely expected, regardless of what you may think of his views.
1
Replying to
To me the only standout criticism of Chomsky here is that his language is insufferably academic and stilted. But so too with Harris!
1
Replying to
Lastly, the implication that Harris published this letter "just to show the difficulty of debating" is completely, utterly ridiculous.
1
Replying to
Who would do such a pathetic thing? Does anyone need a demonstration that debate, particularly hostile debate, is hard?
Be honest...
1
Replying to
None of this would bother me very much if I didn't see a whole lot of people in my timeline praising Harris as if he's very clever here.
1
Replying to
He is clever in a way that can only be described as weasely. He is not debating Ben Affleck (!) rhis time. His grandstanding is unjustified.
Replying to
People like Harris look insightful by virtue of debating complete tools. If this is accomplishment, I'm Buckminister Fuller (I'm not).
1
Replying to
On the rare occasion that you see them debate a peer, gross distortions in their worldview are made apparent - because they're OBVIOUS!
1
Show replies