Conversation

Pinker, known hack and scientism-proponent, thinks it's fruitless to debate Noam Chomsky. Amusing. Harris' approach was quite arrogant, too.

Quote Tweet

Steven Pinker

@sapinker

May 2, 2015

Sam Harris discovers why it's fruitless to try to debate Noam Chomsky. samharris.org/blog/item/the-

Replying to

If it's not entirely obvious, you don't approach a busy person of similar stature for debate and then refuse to clarify your own position.

Replying to

"Hi, I'd like to talk about these things but I take issue with your presentation and will therefore quiz you relentlessly," is not debate.

Replying to

That a person as intelligent, competent and well-exercised in debate as Harris appears not to know is an indication of ulterior motive.

Replying to

A common technique to make your counterpart look bad is to debate in bad faith, to throw up pointless verbal games like Harris does here.

Replying to

This is in no way a defense of Chomsky's views in general, btw, although I do agree with him on his interpretation of the plant bombing.

Replying to

A characteristic of all the so-called New Atheists is that they appear to be very convinced they, themselves, lack petty motivations.

Replying to

That's a take which is laughable to anyone who understands half as much about human motivation as they profess to do. It shows, here.

Replying to

"I, Sam Harris, am here to engage you in fruitful conversation. What constitutes fruitful conversation is equal to my definition of such."

Replying to

The attempt to find common ground is visibly disingenuous, inasmuch as the easiest way to find common ground is to respond directly.

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Replying to

@Triquetrea

... not to entangle the person *you approached for debate* in some morass of verbal cliches and thought experiments.

4:58 AM · May 15, 2017Twitter Web Client

Replying to

In that sense, Chomsky's anger and vitriol is both entirely justified and entirely expected, regardless of what you may think of his views.

Replying to

To me the only standout criticism of Chomsky here is that his language is insufferably academic and stilted. But so too with Harris!

Show replies