Conversation

Replying to

@killerswan

@crstry

and

@Triquetrea

but I bet anyone who first conceives of that by family relationships is not as much on my side as they think they are

Replying to

and

It's down to how you reify what a person "is", in a sense.

Replying to

and

In another, this conceptual dicking about obscures the actuality, where a provisional strategic partnership may work

Replying to

and

work in what way? what do you expect to happen here, or what even could happen?

Replying to

and

(my thinking on this doesn't get into reification of personhood, etc, it's all just me pattern matching on abuser logic)

Replying to

and

"prominent republican says he loves his family soooooo much that he's willing to lightly criticize a rapist"

Replying to

and

people then hope that the rapist can be replaced by the "miscarriages are murder, gays should be electrocuted" candidate

Replying to

and

and when people make noise about who's on which side the men say "see this is why feminism will fail"!?

Replying to

The more people hammering Trump on this, the better. No new Christian candidate would be elected now. realpolitik.

Replying to

and

can you explain this more? I don't get what you're trying to say about Christian candidates

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Replying to

@killerswan

Your sideline about his replacement. Trump being replaced now would guarantee a Republican loss. Big win for women.

@crstry

2:51 PM · Oct 9, 2016Twitter for Android

Replying to

and

maybe, maybe not: I dunno how it would affect congressional voting, for example

Replying to

and

and longer term I dunno, either: H is on more solid ground if she wins fair and square

Show replies