On a medium with technically zero transaction cost, your old rules and laws fail. That's not piracy. That's the nature of the beast.
Conversation
Replying to
True, although Facebook deserves all the bad publicity they can get on this one. But the label 'editor' is telling.
3
Replying to
See, both are wrong. But only being against both doesn't change anything. I want to fight FOR something. Not AGAINST.
1
Replying to
Seems in many ways like a crypto issue vis-a-vis blockchain. Facebook and Google control what they should merely distribute.
1
When someone figures out or circumvents who watches the watchmen, we might get somewhere with this.
1
E.g. Aftenposten is a partisan newspaper. The state is a censorship organ. Freedom of information is the missing link here.
1
If arbiters like states, Facebook and newspapers weren't the ones responsible for verifying and filtering facts, we'd be golden.
1
Replying to
Issue isn't just centralisation but underlying tech fundamentals. Need better security to weaken centralized power. p2p, bc etc.
3
Replying to
building such same-level tools is not what VC likes. And crowdfunding also doesn't help. So it is up to Open. Takes time. I know
1
2
Replying to
Regardless of who does it, we will need sufficiently Cool Tech. I expect this is where good change will come, if at all.
Replying to
yep. The missing link for accountable action is what we are working on. Global, decentralised secure identity. #TCPID