On a medium with technically zero transaction cost, your old rules and laws fail. That's not piracy. That's the nature of the beast.
Conversation
Replying to
True, although Facebook deserves all the bad publicity they can get on this one. But the label 'editor' is telling.
3
Replying to
See, both are wrong. But only being against both doesn't change anything. I want to fight FOR something. Not AGAINST.
1
Replying to
Seems in many ways like a crypto issue vis-a-vis blockchain. Facebook and Google control what they should merely distribute.
1
When someone figures out or circumvents who watches the watchmen, we might get somewhere with this.
1
E.g. Aftenposten is a partisan newspaper. The state is a censorship organ. Freedom of information is the missing link here.
1
If arbiters like states, Facebook and newspapers weren't the ones responsible for verifying and filtering facts, we'd be golden.
1
Replying to
Issue isn't just centralisation but underlying tech fundamentals. Need better security to weaken centralized power. p2p, bc etc.
3
Replying to
Ultimately IMHO it is about us looking up instead of left and right to our fellow citizens to make a change.
1
Replying to
Indeed. My main issue is I don't know how to code. Working on it, but I'm behind the times. :P Real work is in secure info imo.
Replying to
happy to hear you see that coding is an essential skill. Take your time. I am planning in 5-10 years anyway :)
1
Replying to
Politics would be a useful tool if our political system wasn't bankrupt and leaking legitimacy. As is, we need better code first