I've never heard squealing like that from the Libertarians who understood this case and fled from it.
Conversation
too often we confuse (monetary) value with (societal) values.
1
it's not clear to me that "society" in that sense exists outside of shared religious beliefs.
4
bold and brave became whining safe space kiddos. Killed initiative with religious money cultism. VC ;-)
2
hahahaha I think the problem wasn't the VC (ahem!) but a misunderstanding of feminism.
1
1
question is: what now? What's the plan? Not more poking at symptoms.
2
New moral standards for all actors involved. Fundamental rework of system, not revolution as such.
1
yes. In history religion was vessel for that. I hope we have left that behind. If not, I become priest.
1
I think you can do without religion, but meme culture "fixes" discomfort ("share/like for visibility!")
1
3
At which point it would have to be shipped to people as a fundamental right, like personal freedom was.
Very first should be right to own your identity. Rest follows. If identity is granted as now -wrong.
democracy needs voters. Voters must identify to avoid double votes etc. Denying identity is common.
so radically changing identity ownership by making it a fundamental human right is key IMHO.
and that's one of my projects. Self-owned global identity. Working title freedentity and TCP/ID
1
Oh, I understand now. Under the current system, states *own* our identity as "citizenship". Nauseating.
6
1
Show replies
back to original point. Where stuff got crazy was when property concept was transported to thoughts.
the mad world of "intellectual property". Esp when looking at software patents. That must change too.