when I first saw it that way, I damn near fell off my chair. Now it seems very ordinary. You saw en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_C ?
Conversation
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
so real Q: who defends the have-nots? State? Who leans towards the rich?That's core of problem.
1
State is itself a landowner, so by nature cannot arbitrate. Property needs a fundamental concept check.
4
I've never heard squealing like that from the Libertarians who understood this case and fled from it.
6
too often we confuse (monetary) value with (societal) values.
1
it's not clear to me that "society" in that sense exists outside of shared religious beliefs.
4
bold and brave became whining safe space kiddos. Killed initiative with religious money cultism. VC ;-)
2
hahahaha I think the problem wasn't the VC (ahem!) but a misunderstanding of feminism.
1
1
question is: what now? What's the plan? Not more poking at symptoms.
2
New moral standards for all actors involved. Fundamental rework of system, not revolution as such.
yes. In history religion was vessel for that. I hope we have left that behind. If not, I become priest.
1
I think you can do without religion, but meme culture "fixes" discomfort ("share/like for visibility!")
1
Show replies