my point still stands.
Conversation
Replying to
Right, so there's no economic system that isn't related to rules. The statement "capitalism is related to gov't" becomes trivial.
7
1
Replying to
. Given that property is socially constructed, we should define property rights which create the world we would prefer to live in
3
7
12
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
Replying to
when I first saw it that way, I damn near fell off my chair. Now it seems very ordinary. You saw en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_C ?
2
You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more
so real Q: who defends the have-nots? State? Who leans towards the rich?That's core of problem.
1
State is itself a landowner, so by nature cannot arbitrate. Property needs a fundamental concept check.
4
communism is proof-of-concept for state rights. We need a property concept w/human rights at the bottom.
1
not reshuffling of power in current paradigm