So, time for a meditation thread.
I wanna talk a bit about location-based awareness, something I had significant brushes with but have done far too little of.
It's a priority practice for me again lately, and I want to do some quick recaps of ground I've already tread.
Conversation
Replying to
I'm not sure this capacity to shift your location of consciousness is as accessible to most people as you seem to suggest, especially those shifts outside the physical body. You seem to be doing a sort of rudimentary shamanic journeying. Test some perceptions objectively?
1
4
Replying to
1: Entirely possible (see QT).
2: In what sense objectively? Seeing if I can get someone else to replicate it?
Quote Tweet
One thing I'm always forced to admit when it comes to meditation:
I'm a bit of an idiot savant. I can do a lot of things that I don't know how I accomplished, and so it's difficult to explain.
All of this stuff is very much accessible, but I can't necessarily show you how.
1
1
Replying to
Curious if your shift in location of "I" simply places you somewhere else in your existing perceptual field, as seen from your physical eyes, or if your perception actually changes. Can you "see" something that your eyes can not see? If so can you verify that perception after?
1
Replying to
Think I need some disambiguation of those questions.
You say perceptual field, but using the eyes as referent makes it sound like you're talking about the visual field.
Are you asking specifically about visual or pseudovisual inputs, or any kind of possible sense impression?
Replying to
Good point. I am curious as to whether your vantage point actually changes visually. Can you see the back of your head or or an object behind a wall that is not in your visual field. Wondering is you have a kind of localized remote viewing capacity.
1
Replying to
Not as yet. I did experience visions and strange occurences like that in conjunction with this practice the last time I did a lot of it.
But not in the sense of just literally seeing visual inputs from outside my eyes, no. It was a lot more varied and ephemeral.
2
1
Show replies