Right right I think this is a major point of contention between scholars of his work which reminds me: if the thing you do is just be a scholar of someone else's work you're a historian of philosophy not a philosopher
Conversation
Replying to
I think you have succinctly summarized why most academic philosopher's *don't* engage with Wittgenstein's work, ironically enough.
1
Replying to
Loool shot myself in the foot there although it's hard to make a man engage with a body of work when it implies that his whole field and life have been a fake
1
1
"I know that motherfucker datamined those findings, a meta-analysis"
1
1
1
Actually, I unironically want to go into statistics just to launch this subfield.