Longing to read a meditation book where the author doesn't spend a fourth of the text trying to convince me awakening == "the next step in evolution."
This is such a nauseatingly modernist, bad evolutionary biology perspective. Can you just stop?
Conversation
Replying to
Ah nuts I’m breaking my Twitter silence again
Try Lorin Roche. Instinctive meditation. Trying to keep the meditation-geek hordes away from that dude, but also trying to avoid other extreme of not saying anything about a teacher I find valuable.
2
6
Replying to
I am reading this specific book because recommended it and I trust his opinion.
Author just had the standard messianic boilerplate mixed in with good technique.
Will add Roche to my list, though!
1
1
I'm very much not here to hear anyone's dreams of universal enlightenment, but that doesn't mean they don't have useful tekne!
It just sucks that they waste my time with these asininities.
1
1
I have a hunch there’ll be things in Roche’s work that you find refreshing. He’s a neat dude, interesting backstory. Completely different goals and approach than Cutting Machine. Roche is working much more in the lane of “meditation as nutrition” style, than...
2
1
Oh, for sure. I'm so far down the Cutting Machinery rabbit hole now that seeing it all the way through is a top priority, though.
3
2
Curious, did you have a 'dark night' experience following Cutting Machinery? I did and stopped using the method.
2
2
Not exactly.
The emotional processing step can be risky without grounding (or if you've got bad trauma!) - I had some crazy emotion, but that was mostly avoidable.
Depending on what you mean by "dark night", it seems more common with Buddhist anatta - what was happening to you?
Also, *that* Dark Night is a bit of a paper tentacle-fiend. You start viewing it through the right lens, it's actually pretty cool.
But I'm aware not everyone uses the term that way. Seems be used to describe any form of bad insight trip. Hence my asking for elaboration.
1