Conversation

I realized today in a new way that most of the shrieking in civilization is done to prevent people following thoughts to their conclusion. i.e. left or right, rich or poor, your lifestyle still depends on the exploitation of Chinese factory workers. We are all complicit in this.
6
93
Replying to
I am not so sure that following thoughts to their conclusion is necessarily good I think one could stare at the below graphic until one leans back and the hands come together and the fingertips touch & a thought of 'hmm, this could actually work...' comes along
Image
2
3
Replying to and
Thoughts have more than one set of logical conclusions depending on the perspective that animates them, yes. The problem is that rich people & comfy servants' perspectives are behind most of the thinking that informs power. And the majority of that thinking is pitifully myopic.
1
1
Replying to and
For the rest of us the problem seems to be that while we are far enough down the rungs to feel the water rising, our understanding of & access to power is weak. We need a path to cut through elite BS without just handing everything over to an equally myopic elite a la Communism.
1
1
Replying to and
But even when somebody like does shows in detail how people ought to do systems thinking and social organisation, people just smile and nod. Not sure what can fill this near-total void of cultural, political AND individual responsibly.
1
3
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Can we outline a psychological path that begins with physics & proceeds thru chemistry & biology & physiology? (I can't find the video I was looking for so the below will have to suffice for the moment)
Quote Tweet
youtube.com/watch?v=0xl1Zu "Didem RahvancΔ±: Why life need left-handed amino acids (with simultaneous translation)" ⏰ (4m:46s) πŸŽ₯ #homochirality
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies