...all have stains on their records), we could function as a bulwark & an ark for people fleeing the hardest hit areas.
In a hundred years, if nation states are still a thing, if humans are still a going concern (eg we haven’t eliminated ourselves or been out competed by tech...
Conversation
...or our genetically engineered descendants or a Singularity)...
then Kalmar could organize the peaceful migration/settlement of new populations in Greenland.
Two hundred and fifty years from now, Kalmar and New Zealand collaborate in settling coastal Antarctica.
1
1
Heck, let’s get really crazy. Kalmar happens, and five years after it’s founding (which occurs dramatically in 202_), the Celtic fringe of Britain leaves and joins Kalmar as well. (Northern Ireland, of course, joins the unified Republic of Eire). So Scotland is a Kalmarian realm
1
1
by the 2030s.
Not much else to say. To recap: Kalmar union acts as one of world’s tolerant, non-eco-fascist lifeboats in time of climate chaos and mass migration.
In long-term, Kalmar helps create new human communities in novel environments
2
1
2
Replying to
Terrible name! The Kalmar union was pure Dano-Swedish exploitation.
Otherwise, yeah, cool idea. But incompatible with NATO & the EU. How to navigate that?
3
Which sucks, because Kalmar is kind of a cool name, but if the Norwegians are going to feel shitty about it, we gotta win them over somehow.
OK, how to get around NATO and the EU 🤔
2
So I think the EU is actually the easier one. Either we strong-arm the Norwegians to join (of course we have to convince the Euros to let Canada in too)...
or we negotiate a Kalmarexit. Of course, because Canada and the four northern states (I can't remember if there is a...
1
1
collective description that fits all four of Denmark, Finland, Norway & Sweden; I think "Nordic" and "Scandinavian" only fit three of four, and its not the same three)...anyways, we've got superior diplomats, so we won't f*** up a Kalexit the way the Brits are doing it.
2
1
I think in case of Finland the obvious problem would be is that the average Finn is pretty proud of the independent status of our country, due to historical reasons. Joining in with the Swedes would be, suspicious. In your speculation, how to overcome that?
2
1
I also think NATO membership is actually a mistake for EU and for hypothetical. It's a US-dominated system by design.
This project is about independence from US hegemony on trade, security, military. NATO membership undermines that.
Outsourcing mil to US is a cost saver, but...
But the opportunity cost is far, far greater than the cost of actually maintaining troops. US mil is massively bloated and inefficient, so not a good comparison.
European coalition army would exceed US capabilities at much lower cost, from not needing coercive forward ops.
2
1
The weird pickle that we'd be in as Kalmar is the need to maintain defence integration between CAN and the US
The ostensible reason for that is continental defence integration and interoperability
The unspoken reason is that we are, since 1945, effectively a colony of the US
2
1
Show replies