Conversation

Replying to
I used to be big into social democracy. If you're gonna make me choose between shitty old systems, I probably go with that. But at best it's just "capitalism with a human face", pushing the violence and exploitation to the margins, still wasteful and ecologically destructive.
1
1
So it's interesting to see kids growing up in the total certainty that all of this shit is just bullshit, and should be replaced. Give it some time, and it probably will be.
1
1
Replying to
Most human political solutions are better AND worse than their predecessors, for some value of either. So what? It's hard to do worse than killing off billions of people and making large parts of the planet uninhabitable for humans in the near future, though, tbh.
1
Replying to
If you could improve prospects for near-term species survival with forced sterilisation or a bioengineered flu, it's bad politics - even in the context of human politics, which are sort of fucking mediocre to begin with.
1
Replying to
Oh, I don't think you can effectively construe it in those terms, until much later. We may well be dead by then. A lot of revolutions are false starts or regressive, of course, but I think we're already seeing the seeds of those. When the next depression hits, which it will...
1
Replying to
Pre-ww1 you have the same mixture of belle epoque, "things were never better" elites with profound popular discontent, and cracks in the facade all around.
1
Replying to
I am young enough to remember kids my age and their concept of radicalism: anarchy, communism, fascism... same old. The new kids are different. Unmoored, making new movements entirely. As far as I can tell, communist/fascist sentiment is a millennial strain, mostly.
1