Conversation

Sometimes, empathy with one person entails a real struggle not to murder one or more other people with extreme prejudice. This, at scale, is why "raising the level of empathy" in society is not some sort of positive ambition.
1
1
I'm possibly not very civilized, in that I think the world would certainly be a better place if certain people could just be, y'know, killed. But that's never how it happens, at any scale worth talking about for society. You never just kill the superpredators and call it a day.
1
2
Our species gives birth to these individuals because they have a niche. No amount of murder will ever get rid of them. If anything, our propensity for violence is one of the things that carve out this niche for antisocial disorders and exceptional levels of self-interest.
Replying to
I suspect you can blame our general, species-level ugliness for the exceptionally awful ugliness of some individual members of it. So we could shoot all the bankers, politicians and executives we want, then watch as new predators move in to fill the vacant niche. Yippie.
1
1
So is there any basic political thrust that could change any of that? Perhaps some form of transhumanism would make sense. Except, of course, any transhumanist project would be managed, on some level, by humans.
1
1
Replying to
You know, I agree with you entirely here, and I've never heard anyone 1) just come out and say that their empathy makes them feel like some people should be killed and 2) point out why that *wouldn't work* Thank you.
1
1
Show replies