Trump is a religious figure.
Conversation
Capitalism is a religious system, period, IMO.
Invisible hand, free market, mythological constructs bestowing virtue of the greedy, economy's as priests, gatekeepers, elite monopoly on shared cultural production vs masses, etc.
2
Some if the invisible hand is real. It's emergent phenomena. People trade in goods and services and create wealth. The feudal Lord lauded as the "captain of Industry" is the BS part.
1
1
There is so much in the way of tradition, barriers, unfair advantage, privilege, culture, etc, that the hand is anything but invisible.
Portraying it as such is a way to obscure all that, in the same way that organised religion used "God" to obscure their systemic functions.
3
You mention the word God. That strikes me as how you use capitalism. To you capitalism is evil. To say "down with evil" and enjoining everyone to eschew it, strikes me as pointless.
1
As I say, it's not going anywhere. Much like religion post secularism. It just needs outing in its box, out of harms way.
If I use it like God, it's because I see others using it thusly.
1
It just seems to me like a super vague, unweildy, super emotionally charged word.
2
Conservatives use "socialism" almost the same way you use "capitalism" to connote everything they see as bad. In reality we have a mix of both.
1
I do think all forms of capitalism are bad. Now.
It's a system born of knowledge and culture as it was a few hundred years ago, and is now horrifically outdated, anachronistic, and destructive.
It wasn't always thus. But context is all.
1
Isn't this an argument across levels of analysis?
Ted seems to be contending that you are overassociating negative characteristics of social reality with capitalism (I agree), and you that capitalism is a dysfunctional system of governance in need of replacement (I also agree).
4
It doesn't seem like these arguments you are passing to each other actually contend about the same issues.