I never get what people are doing when they rail against capitalism. I never understand their definition nor there solution. " I woke up with a sore neck! $@&#! Capitalism!
Conversation
Here is a question:
If we kill the ability to accumulate vast, billionaire fortunes, clearly there will be less inequality - given the tremendous work those shits put into hoarding.
But would our species-level rapacity stop? Would overconsumption halt? War?
My feeling is no.
2
1
If anything, capitalism grew *from* those structures & processes... it's a dysfunctional c&c system, but it is just that - it isn't a root cause.
If you take your point about feudalism, capitalism is more like a dysfunctional sovereign than a system unto itself, I think.
2
1
All of these polluting megacorps, exploitative billionaires and so on are bootstrapped on top of industrial technologies that lack any historical precedent, unless you're a biblical literalist or something.
There is no telling how bad we could make alternative control systems.
1
1
I think there are two roots to this problem that capitalism did not create, and the end of capitalism will not solve (in and of itself):
- the human organism is massively maladapted for the environment we engineered, and our hegemony is an ecological risk unto itself
- pollution
2
3
So my feeling is, until we get really serious about how to solve a 10 billion plus population boom, or our ludicrous destructive capabilities vs. our very limited species-level coordination, or the staggering inefficiency of our tech, capitalism remains an academic issue.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Here's the idea I don't trust:
The idea that people will get together worldwide and agree that capitalism kinda sucks and should be replaced AND that they figure out how to create a system that pollutes minimally, repairs ecosystems, distributes resources equitably...
1
1
It just seems completely at odds with all of human history to ascribe this level of *effective, coordinated* agency to large groups.
A few fanatics get together and break shit. Structures collapse. People organically build new stuff. Life goes on, in unexpected new directions.
1
1
We've done it before in times of crisis. Total war, for instance.
1
Yeah, sure, but what happens is that the crisis resolves and there are temporary conventions convened that give rise to new structures - lines redrawn, resources & rights redistributed.
Then life just sort of goes on, with a bunch of new accretions and some shed skin.
I am not suggesting that systems don't collapse, aren't replaced. Just that there is really no such thing as a controlled demolition.
1
Sure, except this time we have a universally shared minimum bar that if we don't fulfill, equals utter ruin.
This really is an unprecedented environment, in an unprecedented situation.
Expect unprecedented emergence.
1