I think there are two roots to this problem that capitalism did not create, and the end of capitalism will not solve (in and of itself):
- the human organism is massively maladapted for the environment we engineered, and our hegemony is an ecological risk unto itself
- pollution
Conversation
So my feeling is, until we get really serious about how to solve a 10 billion plus population boom, or our ludicrous destructive capabilities vs. our very limited species-level coordination, or the staggering inefficiency of our tech, capitalism remains an academic issue.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Here's the idea I don't trust:
The idea that people will get together worldwide and agree that capitalism kinda sucks and should be replaced AND that they figure out how to create a system that pollutes minimally, repairs ecosystems, distributes resources equitably...
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
We're thinking in tandem, here. Some options:
- destroy/replace worst polluters & technologies
- asteroid mining & renewable tech
- kill 5 billion+ people, start over (ok, am half-joking)
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Here is something I can't parse well:
We can simulate, by some rudimentary criteria, the intelligence of certain not-so-quick animals. By combining that with superhuman processing speed, memory handling, clarity about goals etc., you can create pockets of superhuman performance.
2
You can give these severely-limited-but-selectively-superhuman intelligences mechanical bodies, or strap them to control systems that make decisions with real-world ramifications.
What effect are we seeing from these things being released with various operational directives?
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
AI rule is already in effect even without robotic hoardes.