Conversation

I think there are two roots to this problem that capitalism did not create, and the end of capitalism will not solve (in and of itself): - the human organism is massively maladapted for the environment we engineered, and our hegemony is an ecological risk unto itself - pollution
2
3
So my feeling is, until we get really serious about how to solve a 10 billion plus population boom, or our ludicrous destructive capabilities vs. our very limited species-level coordination, or the staggering inefficiency of our tech, capitalism remains an academic issue.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Here's the idea I don't trust: The idea that people will get together worldwide and agree that capitalism kinda sucks and should be replaced AND that they figure out how to create a system that pollutes minimally, repairs ecosystems, distributes resources equitably...
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
We're thinking in tandem, here. Some options: - destroy/replace worst polluters & technologies - asteroid mining & renewable tech - kill 5 billion+ people, start over (ok, am half-joking)
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Here is something I can't parse well: We can simulate, by some rudimentary criteria, the intelligence of certain not-so-quick animals. By combining that with superhuman processing speed, memory handling, clarity about goals etc., you can create pockets of superhuman performance.
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Yes, I am not suggesting these systems are conventionally intelligent. I am suggesting they are embodied agents with force behind their decision-making structure.
1
We can see that human cognition fucks itself in our environment. But humans are full of biological redundancies and failsafe systems. You can put a bunch of human-made complex systems into play and QA them to hell and back, but what happens when they interact organically?
1
Show replies