Here is a question:
If we kill the ability to accumulate vast, billionaire fortunes, clearly there will be less inequality - given the tremendous work those shits put into hoarding.
But would our species-level rapacity stop? Would overconsumption halt? War?
My feeling is no.
Conversation
If anything, capitalism grew *from* those structures & processes... it's a dysfunctional c&c system, but it is just that - it isn't a root cause.
If you take your point about feudalism, capitalism is more like a dysfunctional sovereign than a system unto itself, I think.
2
1
All of these polluting megacorps, exploitative billionaires and so on are bootstrapped on top of industrial technologies that lack any historical precedent, unless you're a biblical literalist or something.
There is no telling how bad we could make alternative control systems.
1
1
I think there are two roots to this problem that capitalism did not create, and the end of capitalism will not solve (in and of itself):
- the human organism is massively maladapted for the environment we engineered, and our hegemony is an ecological risk unto itself
- pollution
2
3
So my feeling is, until we get really serious about how to solve a 10 billion plus population boom, or our ludicrous destructive capabilities vs. our very limited species-level coordination, or the staggering inefficiency of our tech, capitalism remains an academic issue.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Here's the idea I don't trust:
The idea that people will get together worldwide and agree that capitalism kinda sucks and should be replaced AND that they figure out how to create a system that pollutes minimally, repairs ecosystems, distributes resources equitably...
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I don't think there is any grand sweeping ideological solution, except working to empower people a bit more and helping them to make better decisions.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I don't. Most of the tech labelled 'AI' today is only good at stuff humans are so dogshit at, we find any degree of precision, nonlateral learning, absolute goal-driven decision-making or processing power at all overwhelming.
The sorts of systematic errors made by those systems are slightly different to the ones made by humans, but not necessarily smart.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies

