It's definitely got the air of collapse, rather than ascendency, about it.
Conversation
Replying to
It's interesting to note that the dems started their delusional death spiral with Trump - "Not my president" etc.
And now the Republicans are running scared before four or so democratic socialist congresswomen.
This could very well end up unravelling the 2-party system.
1
Replying to
I hope for it (which is why I'm a bit skeptical). I think we need the US in the game, and it isn't happening with these mooks in charge.
Confused Dems talk about electoral unity, as if this iteration of their beloved party wasn't itself a breakaway faction formed during a crisis
1
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I'd rather a country with 20,000+ nukes didn't outright collapse, tbqh.
Although if it's a choice between that, and the US clinging on to power for another 20 years & condemning us to a hothouse earth, we might as well take the risk.
1
Replying to
See also: global market share, speed of innovation, local resource consumption, etc.
2
Replying to
I think innovation has long since stopped being the domain of the US.
Unless you mean in ways to make rich people's lives that bit more convenient and hipsterish.
1
Replying to
I think we're talking past each other. The country best placed to fund green tech, or defund fossil fuels, or change the state of the oil game, is the US.
That will remain true for the entire window of opportunity to do anything except pray, unless the models are very wrong.
2
If the models are wrong, we may get off easier than expected. If they ain't, it's US or nothing. China will fold if expedient, I'd expect. V. pragmatic regime.
But so long as the US keeps pushing the oil game, folding isn't expedient for China...
1
So I'm only talking about the US's (unmerited or dated, perhaps, but still very real) cultural leadership.