Conversation

Replying to and
Pretty amazing to see in the case of one of my in-laws: He left Poland as a clueless neoliberal type for a summer job. Came back several months later as a born-again fundamentalist. Completely bizarre. Completely normal, too.
1
1
Replying to and
Now he also believes vaccines cause autism (no small irony, given he's like 90% likely to have undiagnosed Asperger), and that you need to supplement vitamin C in quantities that would make Hitler's ol' "inject methamphetamine directly into the spinal cord" doctor blush.
1
Replying to and
Sounds like a good test-case to see if there's a way of talking people down from this stuff. For some anti-vax types it's a whole lifestyle - Steiner fans, homeopaths - but these recent converts must surely be curable - there's less of a reason for them to believe.
2
Replying to and
If anything, I think he's the exact evidence of how this usually functions: it's a fad. An extremely dangerous fad. But a fad. People are just very poor at judging which fads are worth investing in.
1
1
Replying to and
It's interesting to me because it doesn't seem to push that many of the usual buttons for beliefs like this; if we look at the range of human emotional needs a fully-evolved religion (or even some less well-defined lifestyles) provides, this stuff is pretty weak.
1
1
Replying to and
It's too narrow a topic for people who don't have a religious/pseudo-religious background, so it has limited community benefits. It doesn't provide comfort, but also doesn't provide a regular dose of fear. The risk is that other conspiracy theory type stuff is the next step.
1
1
Replying to and
Yes, which mostly tells you how weak our institutions and social fabric have become - most people are barely even duct taped together. This is what people inside establishment bubbles can't understand. It's a jungle out here. Nobody actually believes in anything anymore.
1
1
Replying to and
I was saying recently to a neighbour that any act of collaboration or community feels like rebellion because society has been so completely and actively fractured. We're going to start doing shared meals and I think it'll feel way more subversive than it should.
1
Replying to and
Atomizing social relations, in and of itself, is something that should only foster social bonds. It produces much-closer-to-spec social units. But when you layer an economics of exploitation on top of it...
1
1
Replying to and
Yeah, quite. People don't have the headspace or the time to talk to their neighbours, let alone organise. The people who do can end up being a gradually narrowing elite of relatively time-rich and/or financially rich people.