a thing i'm curious about is why anti-smoking type ads don't go more aggressively with the social shaming
if I were tasked with this I think I'd do something more brazen like "JUUL SMOKERS ARE INSECURE"
it doesn't have to be true, it just needs to seep into common consciousness
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
i'm not actually suggesting aggressive policing, see replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
different types of policing have different effects depending on the context and execution
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
it depends on how you do it. as a teenage smoker myself with lots of smoker friends, I have to disagree
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
+ Really not very much on board with the ethics of institutionalizing shaming people for doing something that is harmful to themselves.
I think there are better ways to handle this stuff.
2
In Norway smoking rates are declining pretty fast.
I think that's a combination of things. One is legislating in favor of non-smokers (banning indoors smoking etc.), which is essential. I lived in Prague long enough to appreciate how much life sucks for non-smokers otherwise.
Another is that smoking is perfectly legal, but subjected to heavy tariffs.
A pack of cigarettes is really, really expensive, on the order of a full day's worth of (cheap) food for one person.
Smokers subsidize their own health care costs, effectively.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I heard Singapore, for example, fines people for throwing buds on the ground?
I don't know if that is the case or just my gramps waffling as usual, but I think it's good policy if true. Don't pollute common areas. That's important.
1
Show replies


