Conversation

Good arguments, and I agree, but my point is less about their embrace of Peterson himself, and more the paucity of alternative, more respectable, less unhinged options. Is this the best they can do?
Quote Tweet
Replying to @Triquetrea and @Grimeandreason
Peterson says weird conservative stuff on a fairly regular basis, but his actual politics are neolib even on social issues. He's a hardcore moderate, scared of turning dials. So establishment embracing him is totally unsurprising. It maintains a veneer of ideological openness.
1
1
Replying to
Peterson is just more interesting than the usual suspects. Who even remembers the typical talking heads? If you mean the lack of charismatic alternatives, then yes, that makes perfect sense. Right is energised & networked. Left is scattered and infighting. The Center is dying.
2
Replying to
It's not really a hegemony if it can't sustain itself, is it? The nativists and fascists are already pouncing. Saw someone wanting to throw Spain out of the EU over criminalising the Catalan referendum. Problem is, they'd have to also throw out Slovakia, CR, Poland and Hungary.
3
The EU is the closer WRE analogue I'd you regard it as more of a mercantile empire. It has shown some ability to project force (Greece), but it's overstretched and burdened by corruption, infighting and weak leaders. Moreso than the US.
3
Replying to
No one has explained to me yet how the EU goes left to avoid fascism and climate breakdown when fascists and climate deniers hold veto powers. What worked in good times doesn't work in times of collapse. History is pretty clear about that.
1
Replying to
Exactly. In terms of organisation & leadership, the western left is still in its tiny after basically being obliterated. Not exactly the most resilient network in the world. But then, it's gonna take something unprecedented to avoid catastrophe, & that'll likely be bottom-up.
1
Replying to
Expect change when the bottom gets flooded, i.e. as soon as crops in India or GMO monocultures start failing. This is why I think is right about a projected death toll of billions. We will only act when tens of millions are dead. The cascades will only just have begun.
3
Show replies