Conversation

Good arguments, and I agree, but my point is less about their embrace of Peterson himself, and more the paucity of alternative, more respectable, less unhinged options. Is this the best they can do?

Quote Tweet

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Nov 13, 2018

Replying to @Triquetrea and @Grimeandreason

Peterson says weird conservative stuff on a fairly regular basis, but his actual politics are neolib even on social issues. He's a hardcore moderate, scared of turning dials. So establishment embracing him is totally unsurprising. It maintains a veneer of ideological openness.

Replying to

Peterson is just more interesting than the usual suspects. Who even remembers the typical talking heads? If you mean the lack of charismatic alternatives, then yes, that makes perfect sense. Right is energised & networked. Left is scattered and infighting. The Center is dying.

Replying to

and

The system will spit out multiples of Petersons and people further right for every Corbyn.

Replying to

Oh, the ratio is like 50:1 in that respect, in neoliberal hegemonies, anyway.

Replying to

It's not really a hegemony if it can't sustain itself, is it? The nativists and fascists are already pouncing. Saw someone wanting to throw Spain out of the EU over criminalising the Catalan referendum. Problem is, they'd have to also throw out Slovakia, CR, Poland and Hungary.

Replying to

and

And probably some others I know less about.

11:33 AM · Nov 13, 2018Twitter Web App