Conversation

First go at a meta/fluid/whatever reading list: The Listening Society In Over Our Heads Seeing Nature In the Cells of the Eggplant (once it exists!) Reinventing Organisations Seeing That Frees The Social Singularity An Immanent Metaphysics The Evolving Self Thinking in Systems

•Jess• •11/100 recorded songs•

@utotranslucence

Oct 27, 2018

Special mention goes to recommendations from others, and books I haven't had a chance to look into much yet to know whether the fit the bill: More Studies in Ethnomethodology From Margin to Center Sources of the Self ...probs some 80s philosophy too.

Replying to

forget reading. practice. contemplate. introspect. worth 10k books.

Replying to

*weeeoooeee* CULT INDOCTRINATION POLICE *weeeoooeee* RUN YA THUGS *weeeoooeee*

GIF

Replying to

and

Reading is awesome and the burden of proof for saying "X is more useful" is the size of Everest. And more difficult to climb. Books are not good for climbing on.

Replying to

and

I like both positions. I think it's true to say both that I've already read more than I'll ever be able to apply, that applying what I've already read would likely yield greater return than merely reading something new, and that I shouldn't stop looking where I've not yet looked.

Replying to

and

My position is "reading is good for you," not "reading is superior to <given alternative". It's much harder to make the reverse case for either statement, however.

•Jess• •11/100 recorded songs•

Replying to

and

My position - reading has diminishing marginal returns, and given the sheer number of pages I’ve read already it’s rarely the highest ROI activity for me. However, now it has highly variable returns, and some things are still very much worth reading.

•Jess• •11/100 recorded songs•

Replying to

In order to read a book, it must: 1) be recommended to death by multiple minds I respect 2) be someone’s life’s work AND 3) continue to seem worth reading as I progress through it (I triage ruthlessly)

Replying to

and

If you're following a linear ROI model, then sure. I wouldn't personally, but I don't think it's a bad thing. The utility or lack thereof of reading is obviously contingent, so...

Replying to

and

I tend to think of it more as slowly weaving threads in a big personal web, in order to catch certain thoughts, ideas, experiences. In that model, any reading that is fun, engaging reading is also good reading - regardless of merit.

9:39 AM · Oct 28, 2018Twitter Web Client

•Jess• •11/100 recorded songs•

Replying to

and

Well, even with my super strict criteria, I still have 15 books on the go currently and a list that is getting added to faster than I’m shortening it. So I’m not worried I’m not going to read enough - just trying to increase the quality.

Replying to

and

It sounds like an interesting challenge. I usually do OK playing it by ear and just binning the occasional dud, but I can respect wanting to sharpen it further.