Realize, productivity for almost all work currently valued in the economy peaks at around ~20 hours/week.
What does this imply about the 40/45 hour work week, or the bloated abominations we find in e.g. Silicon Valley?
Conversation
It's almost like certain Marxist arguments about surplus labour may not be as spurious as certain social institutions would have ya think.
1
The official capitalist mythos is that capitalism is about efficiency, productivity.
It's really only about rent exploitation. Productivity and efficiency are only valued when they generate profits.
1
1
Lots of potential & actual problems with the second order inferences drawn by Marxist economists, but pretty hard to argue against this one.
How many hours a week do you spend performing busyness, with nothing to do? Be honest.
1
If you can perform challenging intellectual work or heavy labour for more than 2-3 hours at peak efficiency, you're either a mutant or on drugs.
1
3
Replying to
Quantity of output matters.
Maximising efficiency when the result is still *less* even if better value per hour still loses.
Less is less.
1
Replying to
We're talking total output times quality, here. For intellectual work, 1 good idea crushes 10 mediocre ones.
Quantity is severely overrated in a lot of professions.
E.g. most of my work is spent correcting bad design documents that could have been done much better, slower.
Replying to
Good ideas have to be implemented and implementation is about quantity of output not just elegance or efficiency or lack of mistakes.
Efficiency and productivity is absolutely fundamental don’t get me wrong but you can’t isolate that as the single dime is up to optimise on.
1
Show replies