Organizing a counterrevolution, against people we openly admit are too clueless to do much of anything, anywhere.
Good stuff.
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I understand localized activism and that some of these issues are quite egregious, in context.
But making a huge societal problem out of an issue that is academic, both literally and figuratively, if you don't live in Sweden? It's fatuous and self-aggrandizing nonsense.
3
1
4
Replying to
It's punching down. Calling up the spectre of ressentiment to silence all callouts of abuse of privilege.
1
The hilarious absurdity of the enemies they're willing to admit to opposing just points to the unspeakability of the full range of their downward punching antipathy.
1
Replying to
See, I always feel like this explanation is missing something.
Punching down is certainly occuring when established professors take political shots at students, but...
1
Replying to
... it's always accidental to the cause. The thought-policing neo-Marxist professors that *do* exist, harass students for ideological reasons.
I suspect for JBP et al., it's also an ideological reason that drives the same behavior. It's something to do with purity, methinks.
1
Replying to
I meant the idw punches down at historically unprivileged people who are trying to make a space for themselves within a hostile culture, and whose representatives occasionally overstep and give an excuse to the beneficiaries of privilege to cry oppression.
1
I agree with JBP's critique of the dangers of ideology, I just think he's shockingly limited?/selective? in his ability?/willingness? to perceive the ideology in 'classical liberalism'.
1
Replying to
I'd say "predictably", rather than "shockingly", but yes.
There is also the excessive reliance on postmodern arguments in his debates, which is just sort of funny.
I'm not a huge fan of the privilege debate for all kinds of complicated reasons, but that's neither here nor there.
1
1
Replying to
Got this courtesy of :
I'm not always so hot on Jungo-Freudian analysis, but this seems pretty solid.
facebook.com/OrthodoxHereti
Yes. The honest anxiety/misconstrued reality vs. false anxiety/empirical correctness dichotomy seems very appropriate to the topic.
1

