Conversation

Cherry picking. Find a peer-reviewed journal that *doesn't* have awful publishing standards.

Quote Tweet

Oct 3, 2018

"It has been the explicit goal of post-modernity to reject reason and evidence: they want a “new paradigm” of knowledge. Should it come as any surprise to us, then, that their journals will publish explicit nonsense?" quillette.com/2018/10/01/the

Cinder

@Triquetrea

It's fair enough that most of these fields are garbage. So is psychology. So are most other fields that are held up as counterpoints. Modern science is in a bad place.

3:40 PM · Oct 3, 2018Twitter Web Client

Replying to

C.f.:

Quote Tweet

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Oct 3, 2018

I had in mind a more ambitious project. Pointing out that “grievance studies” fields are mostly nonsense is shooting fish in a barrel. We know that, for instance, “cognitive neuroscience” is also largely bollocks: biorxiv.org/content/early/

Show this thread

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Oct 3, 2018

Scientific standards, like the self, may be mostly a dream.

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Oct 3, 2018