Conversation

Replying to

and

I really think it depends on your upbringing. If you come from a monotheistic tradition, than I think it can be more helpful. But if you grow up as a scientific materialist, than perhaps not.

Replying to

and

God, if you can believe in a benevolent one, is a great hack and fast road. You have to be very very advanced before it is necessary to "kill the Buddha/God". Most people will never reach that level, even many "masters."

Replying to

and

I killed my God, so I must be a "master" then ;)

Replying to

and

Yeah. There's a whole class of advanced statements that are true at certain levels and really harmful to anyone not very advanced. "If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him." "Do as thou will is the whole of the law." "There is nothing you can do."

Replying to

and

Absolutely. At the same time, I went through many years of confusion over seemingly contradictory ideas, and yet I emerged stronger for it I think. The key, as always, is practice practice practice. Get to know your experiential reality before taking any claim too seriously.

Replying to

and

yeah. Also people say "X is obviously nonsense" a bit too often, imo. They don't have the accomplishments to know, in many cases.

Replying to

and

Yeah, good point. Get to know the sensations in the body and the sensations/mental moments that make up the sense of self, and sort out the rest later.

Replying to

and

This is why I questioned @Failed_Buddhist with "words, words, words"! One of the clearest shifts I've had is to lose interest in talking about practice. It sometimes sticks as a habit, but it feels very not rewarding. "What is your experience like?" is the only question left.

Replying to

If someone describes any sensory underpinnings e.g. of an awakening to me, I instantly know if I am familiar with it. Jargon is both unhelpful - because it's used in different-but-similar ways - and disguises experience and the lack thereof alike.

Replying to

and

language is sometimes helpful for practice, even for relatively experienced practitioners, because it should guide you to experiences you haven't had. And experiences are a bit of a trap: the pursuit of states can be a problem.

Replying to

and

I'm not talking about the pursuit of states, and I don't think we're talking about the same point in a broader context either. But that's my bad with the way I formulated it. I'm saying I find long, jargon-filled philosophical discussions to be less than helpful, mostly.

12:20 PM · Sep 30, 2018Twitter Web Client

Replying to

If you do stick mostly to one method or discipline, so that it comes to dominate your thinking around certain terms, I think you can do more talk. For me, I've spent too much time dipping my feet in other people's lakes to do that. My brain is a brambled thicket of associations.

Replying to

If anything, I've now been retreating, drawing boundaries around my practice, hemming it in - so that I can talk about it more in the future. But the sort of discussion we get into on Twitter, where people are coming from 5 different lineages and methods, is flawed.

Show replies