Conversation

Replying to
some of it is intentionally stylistic (e.g. I refuse to use semicolons) the rest I catch over time when I review. if you mean passages that don't need to be there, I must have looked at every paragraph at least three or four times.
1
1
Replying to
I absolutely do not mean passages that shouldn't be there, nor semicolons. None of that is any of my business. Is your book. I mean grammatical mistakes and typos that don't seem intentional, a few inconsistent details that may be intentional or gaffes. Stuff you wouldn't catch.
Replying to and
If you're writing under contract, these are certainly things an editor can make their business - and if not, many are meddling anyway. But my perspective is, unless they work e.g. for a franchise, editors should stick to fixing unintended mistakes, as well as providing feedback.
1
Replying to and
Ultimately, though, unless they just really hate others touching their work, nobody should edit their own books. Errors are far too stereotyped and idiosyncratic for that. Ditto on the limits of perspective. But yeah, much editorial advice is just BS ('use semicolons!').
1
Show replies