Conversation

Replying to

and

Certainly. In fact, I chose my level of personal presence *very* deliberately, for a number of reasons. It's always fascinating to see where people prefer to draw their own line. Your first tweet seemed a bit judgey, if I'm honest, but this was a good talk. Glad for it.

Replying to

and

Yeah, it was meant to be judgey. Sometimes dialogue and synthesis requires tension...

Replying to

and

Ah, I see your methods are refined... Pissing off my (far smarter, but a bit more gullible) followers is how I bank a lot of benefit from this site. Once I realized people are much more likely to reply if they thing I'm being stupid, I stopped worrying about seeming stupid.

Replying to

and

Exactly, put out a partial truth, let people respond, and then tell them they are also right and revel in a mutual love fest :)

Replying to

and

Friend-making 101

Replying to

and

Well, I rarely do it intentionally. Rather, I open myself to the risk. I find I'm wrong more than often enough organically, I don't have to worry about manufacturing dissent.

Replying to

and

Yes, both and. I also often put out half-baked ideas, let people tell me my blind spots. A form of external processing.

Replying to

and

Oh, well, I'm always like that.

Replying to

and

And really, it's not that strategic. I kind of just let my intuition guide me.

Replying to

and

I feel like for neurotypicals, calculating strategy is more of a fictional trope. The higher-level decisions benefit from some level of abstraction. Thought tends to reify emotional entanglements

Replying to

and

If you're a sociopath, I'll feel a lot safer around you if there is constant strategic thinking at work. If you're an ordinary person, and not e.g. a trained nurse, those thoughts are rationalizations at best. At best.

5:11 PM · Sep 10, 2018Twitter Web App