Conversation

Replying to and
Since empathy and, often, consequences, are more or less opt-in on the web, you do see a lot of people choosing to forego good behaviour. Or, to paraphrase : the risk of getting punched in the face keeps a lot of bullshit at bay.
1
1
Replying to and
Well, still, people definitely entertain fewer constraints even with their mugshot and full name in tow, or even a bluecheck. Can you imagine Nassim Taleb screaming "IMBECILE!" at random pedestrians?
1
Replying to and
I would. Reports are consistently in favor of him being mild-mannered in person. Unless you're an economist or Steven Pinker. I think the tough guy persona is half branding, half wish fulfillment. I'm also a lot less abrasive in person, unless you get me *really* pissed off.
2
1
Replying to and
Yeah, that's why I mentioned having to hold back. I have a very specific strategy where I try to minimize my reactivity to likes & retweets, and maximize for direct replies. This builds a useful form of skin in the game: I have people here whose opinions I value, and I engage.
1
1
Replying to and
Certainly. In fact, I chose my level of personal presence *very* deliberately, for a number of reasons. It's always fascinating to see where people prefer to draw their own line. Your first tweet seemed a bit judgey, if I'm honest, but this was a good talk. Glad for it.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to and
That's also one reason why I argue for asymmetrical levels of skin the game. While losing the wrong follower can sting, it's nothing like losing a close friend. This helps me push the boundaries for my persona, to see what holds up under pressure.
1
1