Conversation

Replying to
If you value your account, that in itself is skin in the game... skin in the game is just having something (pertinent to the topic) to lose.
1
1
Replying to
I think personal identification online is thoroughly overrated. Accountability improves behavior. Reputation stifles it, esp. if you're in a sensitive position.
1
2
Replying to and
Personally, I have very little to lose by revealing more personal information. But it's nobody's business on here unless they're a personal friend. Conversely, I've lost some followers I cared about over contentious topics. To me, that's already plenty of skin in the game.
1
3
Replying to and
As for skin in the game itself, its usefulness both interpersonally and personally seems very context-dependent. You'll typically want your decision to matter. You don't necessarily want your social media presence to affect your personal life directly.
1
1
Replying to
All good points. I'm just pushing back on some corners of anonymous Twitter culture that seem to thrive in the dark. Good and creative for a while, but then mold grows and infections start.
1
2
Replying to
That's fair. However, speaking personally, I am slowly trying to integrate all corners of my life. But before integration has to occur, differentiation is necessary...
1
1
Replying to
Again, the personal utility of skin in the game is paradigmatic. A thief does not want the same profile as a politician does not want the same profile as a teacher. If you can integrate all elements, I think that's a worthwhile enough goal. But for many people, that's a big if.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to and
Since empathy and, often, consequences, are more or less opt-in on the web, you do see a lot of people choosing to forego good behaviour. Or, to paraphrase : the risk of getting punched in the face keeps a lot of bullshit at bay.
1
1
Show replies