Conversation

Touche. But, note that I didn't say having an anonymous avatar couldn't be useful or creative. I just said that it is the equivalent of having no #skininthegame, of hiding in the proverbial mothers basement with an internet connection.

Quote Tweet

هدف الحكماء

@GRITCULT

Sep 10, 2018

disagree, tell that to satoshi proof of work is in tweet content twitter.com/cognazor/statu…

Show this thread

Replying to

If you value your account, that in itself is skin in the game... skin in the game is just having something (pertinent to the topic) to lose.

Replying to

Sure, many scales of #skininthegame. I was just referring to one of them.

Replying to

I think personal identification online is thoroughly overrated. Accountability improves behavior. Reputation stifles it, esp. if you're in a sensitive position.

Replying to

and

Personally, I have very little to lose by revealing more personal information. But it's nobody's business on here unless they're a personal friend. Conversely, I've lost some followers I cared about over contentious topics. To me, that's already plenty of skin in the game.

3:51 PM · Sep 10, 2018Twitter Web Client

Replying to

and

As for skin in the game itself, its usefulness both interpersonally and personally seems very context-dependent. You'll typically want your decision to matter. You don't necessarily want your social media presence to affect your personal life directly.

Replying to

All good points. I'm just pushing back on some corners of anonymous Twitter culture that seem to thrive in the dark. Good and creative for a while, but then mold grows and infections start.

Show replies