Conversation

Replying to
The entire cosmology, all the myths, all the stories, default to this harsh reality. When you die, you don't go to heaven. Your bones are ground to dust in the river of death. You may end up tormented there, as a shade, forever. There is no happy ending.
1
So what do you do? You don't overcome or surpass suffering. You simply get on with the day. You persevere, but not out of some mystical attainment - simply because that's the only option in the face of such a hopeless state of affairs.
1
3
And so suffering is a fact of life, yes. It's ugly, yes. But it's not worth obsessing over. You just do you, and do it as well as you can.
1
2
I know there are Buddhist traditions that diverge from this pattern, of course. I know it's not suffering all the way down. That's a big part of the reason why I preference, say, Zen over Mahayana. A cosmology built ENTIRELY around removing suffering? Please. That's ridiculous.
2
1
Replying to
I am half-joking here, but if you combine Fenno-Ugric cultural mentality with Buddhim you get even more suffering for your suffering. :D I have seen it happen...
1
Replying to
Really? Well, then. I suppose in a lay context it would be just adding suffering as base reality for more areas of your life. "Metaphysically, everything sucks... ... also, my life in particular sucks."
1
Replying to
The Lutheranism infused suffering mentality of the Buddhist groups in Finland kept me away from them quite a while; until I found my current Sangha (Aro gTer), and a couple of other groups. But then again, Aro is mostly for fringe of the fringe. :D
1
Replying to and
That said, Aro is relatively strong in Finland. Which I guess might relate to the fact that there are a lot of outdoor, in the woods or whatever, practices in Aro. Whereas many other groups only sit inside.
1
Replying to
I fullheartedly agree. I sometimes try to do that in the winter too. Although, now in Taiwan though I have somewhat inverse challenge with the elements. 🙃
1
Show replies