There may be stable states which avoid it. The core Mahayana criticism of Theravada is that Arhat nirvana is not a stable state. Eventually you will fall out of it. That is unacceptable to them. Arhat is not a stable state, whereas Buddha level is. (Again, no idea if true.)
Conversation
Replying to
So, things I agree with:
- Only an accomplished practitioner can say what something is really like, experientially.
Things I disagree with:
- Accomplished practitioners are qualified to deal in absolutes.
How do they know what does or doesn't end? I don't see how they could.
1
2
Replying to
They can't know it eternally. They can know it for years, and if you believe in spiritual bodies (and if you don't most of cultivation Buddhism and Hinduism is bullshit to you), then you can speak for centuries and millenia at the least.
2
Replying to
I question that premise.
I certainly believe in elite-level athleticism, but most elite athletes are strongly deluded about their own skills. It's seemingly of benefit to their practice.
1
Replying to
In my youth I was a very very good runner. The difference between the actual elites and the very good is heartbreakingly large. I could multiple lap good non runners. The world level guy could lap me. Most people never get to a level where they can even understand the gap.
2
1
but spiritual practice is more like acrobatics. There are break points: at certain levels of acrobatic skills you can do discrete actions that lesser acrobats or ordinary people can't even do. You aren't just faster by X seconds, or stronger.
1
2
Thanks you two for having this conversation in open feed, interesting stuff.
1
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
This is a really funny idea, actually. Ian and I certainly have an interesting dynamic. Both equally opinionated, one vastly more competent.
I'm not sure if I have any redeeming qualities, but it would probably be fun for others regardless.
I'll ask Ian.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Not sure what you think isn't true?
There is one interesting point in my favor: I learned a lot of the lessons Ian learned fairly late, fairly early. Similar strengths & flaws.
There are other lessons he's learned I'll probably never learn, though. Different strengths & flaws.
He thinks you're competent. In fact, right now, you're probably a better meditator than I am. (I've been better in the past, and will be again, with a bit of luck and diligence). But I'm an old intellectual with good judgment on intellectual matters.
1
1
Show replies