Only (I know you know this) it’s the reaction to / relationship with conscious experience that is the real problem.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
by experience do you mean phenomenal arising of any kind?
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
fair enough. sounds like Dzogchen isn't for you.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
I feel like much of the wishful thinking in Buddhism is directly related to the depressing core premise.
But even if true, why orient around that?
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
The depressing premise.
Buddha's idea is this is fundamental truth, but I'd be inclined to say that's one of those "even if true, how relevant is it?" kind of deals.
There are other fundamental truths you might be able to ascertain as well. Should those also form religions?
Out of curiosity, relevant to what?
The question over what comes after seeing the unsatisfactoriness of clinging to that which is impermanent and not-self, is interesting. If a person realises that to some degree, what are the implications? What next? Why, how, and so on.
1