Conversation

Scientists are human. Science is the work of humans. Humans, and their works, are flawed. This is a problem like our eventual deaths are problems. Sure, it might suck, but what are you going to do? twitter.com/WAWilsonIV/sta

This Tweet is unavailable.

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Jun 20, 2018

Astrophysics and psychology share a common flaw, however: a lack of instruments with sufficient sophistication to measure what needs to be measured. And limited opportunity for direct observation and, hence, for falsification.

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Physics is far more sophisticated and mature than psychology, but there is still human error, measurement error, unknowable variables... The farther you get from our atmosphere, the worse. The more erratic something moves, the worse. Etc.

7:20 PM · Jun 20, 2018Twitter Web App

Replying to

All these things make it harder to respond to chicanery, harder to fight bad science, harder to falsify the eminently flawed. It takes state or megacorp level funding to make a landing on the moon. And we're expecting definitive information about things not locked in orbit? Uh.

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Cinder

@Triquetrea

Jun 20, 2018

I think that's wrong, and presumes a scientistic model of the world. The problem comes from scientism, not science. "Listen to the science!" "But the science is flawed, and the researchers might be biased, and we might be measuring the wrong thing..." "Listen anyway!"

Show replies